Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
Qigong
has been recommended to improve health and prevent disease but the
evidence is inconclusive. The aim of this overview was to critically
evaluate all systematic reviews (SRs) of qigong for the treatment of any condition or symptom.
DESIGN:
Literature searches were carried out in 11 electronic databases for all systematic reviews of the effectiveness of qigong
in any indication. Reviews were defined as systematic if they included
an explicit and repeatable methods section describing the search
strategy and explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria.
SETTING:
Retrospective review of medical database.
PARTICIPANTS:
Participants with any type of medical conditions of any severity were included.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Evidence from each systematic review.
RESULTS:
Ten
systematic reviews were included. They related to a wide range of
conditions. The primary studies and several of the reviews were
associated with a high risk of bias. Five reviews concluded that qigong is effective and five reviews were inconclusive.
CONCLUSION:
The effectiveness of qigong is based mostly on poor quality research. Therefore, it would be unwise to draw firm conclusions at this stage.
- PMID:
- 21369525
- [PubMed]
- PMCID:
- PMC3046559
No comments:
Post a Comment